|
|
| | Home | About | Undergraduate | Postgraduate | Research and Impact | Staff | News & Events | Contact Us | Current Students| Schools Outreach | | |
| You are here: Home > Masters Modules > PPR450: What is Philosophy? Methods, Aims & Debates | |
PPR450: What is Philosophy? Methods, Aims, DebatesObjectivesThe question of how to do philosophy is itself a philosophical question. The primary aim of this team-taught module is to teach students to reflect on different conceptions of what philosophy is and how it should be done. Students will explore the following and/or other topics in metaphilosophy:
Select BibliographyDavid Archard, 'Why Moral Philosophers Are Not and Should Not be Moral Experts', Bioethics 2009: 1-9 Julian Baggini, The Pig that Wants to be Eaten, and Ninety-Nine Other Thought Experiments (Cambridge University Press 2005) Nancy Bauer, 'Is Feminist Philosophy a Contradiction in Terms?', Chapter 1 of her Simone de Beauvoir, Philosophy and Feminism (Columbia University Press 2001). Paul Feyerabend, 'Progress in Philosophy, the Sciences and the Arts' in his Farewell to Reason (Verso 1987) Genevieve Lloyd, 'The Man of Reason' (Routledge 1984; revised edn 1993) Richard Rorty, 'Method, Social Science, and Social Hope' in his Consequences of Pragmatism (University of Minnesota Press 1982) Peter Singer, 'Moral Experts', Analysis 32(1972): 115-117 Nigel Warburton et al., 'What is Philosophy?', Philosophy Bites podcast, http://philosophybites.com/2010/11/what-is-philosophy.html (accessed 30 May 2012) |
|
| | Home | About | Undergraduate | Postgraduate | Research | Staff | News and Events | Contact Us | Current Students | Schools Outreach | | |
| Department of Politics, Philos ophy and Religion County South, Lancaster University,
LA1 4YL, UK Tel: +44 (0) 1524 594260 Fax: +44 (0) 1524 594238 Email: ppr@lancaster.ac.uk |
|
| Save this page:
|
|