Gavin Barrass
Politics, Philosophy & Economics at Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada 2005-06
I
went on exchange over 2005-06 to a Canadian university more than twice
the size of Lancaster placed just outside the centre of a large but little
known capital city called Ottawa. Ottawa was apparently liked by Queen
Victoria who made it the capital of Canada. Apart from being very cold
and having a badminton club, the other attractions for me was thinking
that Canada could be described as "America-lite" the
"new world" but with a soft side. A T-shirt later informed
me Canadians are "unarmed Americans, with health care", so
not far off. To someone who has never been to America, there seemed to
be a great deal of similarities, culturally as well as politically.
The
culture is one of the top reasons for going on an exchange. Culture affects
all areas of life - not just national cultures or regional cultures
but academic culture and student culture. It's certainly not the
case that just because Canadians by and large speak English and have pictures
of the Queen on their bank notes, there is not a distinct and fascinating
culture to experience. Words like "course", "professor"
and "hockey" take on a new meaning. From going to North America
I can now say what an American or Canadian means when they say "major".
I have had a "beaver's tail" in the Byward market in
Ottawa, almost managed to played ice hockey, have been to three NHL games,
and much more besides. I've had the chance to see how sport is taken
seriously, and inclusion in sport is done quite differently. Broad based
degrees replace narrow specialised degrees. I am beginning to appreciate
the potential advantages, but there are some areas that I don't
understand yet. Why is it that a chemical engineering student should study
philosophy of language and communication?
These
are some of the wonders of going on exchange. Most people do not get to
study in more than one university. Doing so allows us to put into context
what our degrees really mean. In Britain academic rigor is the watch-word
of many commentators and members of the public; relevance and practicality
are dismissed as "wishy washy" or "Mickey mouse" degrees.
At Carleton the Political Science Department and Economics Department
were larger than that of our equivalents here in Lancaster; they were
placed next to each other and linked through a Political Economy department.
One of their focuses seemed to be public policy with a practical edge.
By contrast, Lancaster's Economics department is in the centre of
the Management school and the Politics Department is quite philosophical.
The different
Canadian universities all seem to give their subjects their own angle
and have their own approach, making interuniversity comparisons pretty
weak. Britain's view of higher education (if it can be said to have
one) is based on the arbitrary concept of "prestige". Carleton
had exchange students from all sorts of UK universities from Leeds and
Edinburgh to Bradford. It is refreshing to be able to directly experience
how good "last chance U" is - it is a great university
which recruits great students.
«Read more student experiences |